Directs the Administrator to require submitters of any health and safety study of chemicals to disclose funding sources of any funding used for the study. Requires the Administrator, within a year, to establish a risk-based screening process for identifying existing chemicals that are a high priority for a safety assessment and determination and a low priority for a safety assessment and determination.
Directs the Administrator, in implementing the process, to: 1 only consider active chemicals as either high-priority or low-priority chemicals, and 2 only consider inactive chemicals if the Administrator determines that they have not been subject to regulatory or other enforceable action by the Administrator to ban or phase out the chemical and that they demonstrate high hazard and high exposure. Requires the Administrator to complete the prioritization screening process for all active chemicals in a timely manner.
Authorizes the Administrator to screen categories or classes of chemicals to ensure an efficient prioritization screening process to allow for timely and adequate safety assessments and determinations. Requires the Administrator, from time to time, to publish a list of chemicals being considered in the prioritization screening process and request the submission of data on the chemicals.
Requires the Administrator to publish for public comment a proposed screening process and establish criteria for determining whether a substance is a high or low priority. Authorizes the Administrator to defer a prioritization screening decision for a chemical for a reasonable period to allow for the submission and evaluation of additional information.
Requires the Administrator to determine the order for performing safety assessments on high-priority chemicals. Prohibits the Administrator from performing a safety assessment on low-priority chemicals. Requires the Administrator to: 1 publish and keep current a list of both high- and low-priority chemicals, and 2 remove a high-priority chemical from the list when a safety determination for the chemical is published. Prohibits a decision by the Administrator to prioritize a chemical from affecting the manufacture, processing, distribution, use, or disposal of the chemical substance, or regulation of those activities.
Requires the Administrator to make a prioritized screening decision for a chemical within days of receiving a recommendation and relevant information from a state that an active chemical be identified as a priority. Prohibits decisions to prioritize a chemical by the Administrator from being considered to be a final agency action and from being subject to judicial review.
Authorizes the Administrator to require the development of new test data for a chemical if the agency promulgates a rule, enters into a testing consent agreement, or issues an order based on a determination that additional data are needed to perform a safety assessment, make a safety determination, or meet the testing needs of the implementing authority under another federal statute.
Requires the Administrator to develop a tiered testing framework. Requires tier one to include both a screening level exposure assessment and screening tests for hazards. Requires, if the Administrator determines that additional testing is necessary, tier two to include an exposure assessment. Therefore, we continue to anticipate meaningful TSCA reform efforts in , but not before then. We also expect this amended bill to remain a focal point of future negotiations in both houses.
A copy of the amendment to the bill is available here Final-Amendment-to-S. If others have additional details or insights, please feel free to share them with us here at Verdant Law. Although Senator Lautenberg introduced S. Negotiations are supposed to continue over the summer.
Around Labor Day, the parties will decide whether to attempt a bipartisan markup of S. Presumably if negotiations terminate, Senator Lautenberg might reintroduce S.
Republicans would probably oppose it, but may not be in a position to introduce a viable competing bill. One can dream, right? Stay tuned. At that time, the Agency announced a renewed focus on identifying chemicals of concern and initiating appropriate risk management, including regulatory action to restrict or ban chemicals. He spoke extemporaneously. Researchers at the Silent Spring Institute argue that the findings of their consumer product evaluation illustrate the need for full disclosure of ingredient information.
The Institute tested consumer products — ranging from toothpaste to laundry detergent — for compounds identified as either endocrine disruptors or asthma-related. The report has proven highly controversial and been severely criticized by industry for a flawed methodology and equating the mere presence of a chemical in a product with a lack of product safety.
The Institute, and other environmental and public health advocates, clearly plan to use the report to support their arguments for robust reforming of TSCA, the primary federal statute for regulating chemicals in the United States.
TSCA Reform & Chemicals Management
Such advocates argue that many consumer products contain chemicals known to adversely affect human health. They note that for numerous common commercial chemicals, information about their presence in consumer products is limited. In particular, little information is available about hazardous chemical exposures from personal care and cleaning products. The evaluation assessed consumer products for the presence of 66 known endocrine disruptors and asthma causing chemicals.
Tested consumer products ranged from toothpaste to laundry detergent. The researchers found bisethylhexyl phthalate, diethanolamine, and glycol ethers in high concentrations. They found phthalates, monoethanolamine, alkylphenols, parabens, and cyclosiloxanes in many of the products. Sunscreens and scented products such as air fresheners and dryer sheets contained both the largest number of target chemicals and some of the highest chemical concentrations. However, the Institute did not report whether these chemicals were present above limits setting safe levels of exposure. For example, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health recommends diethanolamine exposure be limited to 3 parts per million.
The researchers allege that regulations require only limited product labeling, thereby limiting the information available to consumers. Personal products such as sunscreens, deodorants, and anti-bacterial hand soaps are largely regulated as over-the-counter drugs by the FDA. The Institute asserts that EPA has primary regulatory oversight of cleaning products, and only when these products are pesticide products e.
The Institute also argues that gaps in ingredient information are also problematic for regulators. It argues that EPA, for example, relies on ingredient concentrations in products for exposure modeling. And lastly, the researchers conclude that further study of the risks posed by the types of chemical mixtures that are found in personal care products, cleaning products, etc. US News , Forbes , Consumer Reports , and many other news outlets have published stories on this report. Readers will recall that President Obama appointed Mr. November 30, , will be Mr. It is unclear at this time who will assume Mr.
Owens served the EPA during a two-year period in which Congress, the courts, and various stakeholders engaged in vigorous debate and litigation over the appropriate regulation of chemicals in the United States.
PDF Federal Regulation of Chemicals in Commerce: An Overview of Issues for the th Congress
My last day in the office will be November 30, Although I have been able to get home to see my family periodically, I have essentially been away from them for more than two years. After a lot of hard thinking, we have decided that it is time for me to come home. My wife needs her husband; my sons need their father; and I need them. While I am very happy that I will be back with my family, I will miss all of you greatly. It has been a true privilege to work with so many incredibly talented and dedicated people who are doing so much to protect the health and safety of the American people and our environment.
I am extremely grateful to Lisa Jackson for her wonderful friendship and the remarkable vision and leadership she provides to this Agency. As I said earlier, I will continue working alongside you all through November Administrator Jackson will share additional information about the transition process shortly. Add a note about this bill. Your note is for you and will not be shared with anyone. Because you are a member of panel , your positions on legislation and notes below will be shared with the panel administrators. More Info.
To amend the Controlled Substances Act to more effectively regulate anabolic steroids. Representative for Pennsylvania's 16th congressional district. Enacted — Signed by the President on Dec 18, More statements at ProPublica Represent Introduced on Feb 11, Bills and resolutions are referred to committees which debate the bill before possibly sending it on to the whole chamber.
A committee has voted to issue a report to the full chamber recommending that the bill be considered further. Only about 1 in 4 bills are reported out of committee. The bill was passed in a vote in the House. It goes to the Senate next.
- Zicci: A Tale — Volume 01.
- Battle of the Water Gods!
- Die schöne Müllerin, No. 03 - Halt!, Op. 25, D795 - No. 3 from Die Schöne Müllerin Op.25 - D795!
The vote was by voice vote so no record of individual votes was made. The bill was passed by both chambers in identical form. It goes to the President next who may sign or veto the bill. The vote was by Unanimous Consent so no record of individual votes was made.
- NRI Committee Letters and Testimony to US Congress;
- A Year of Characters?
- Baisers de cinéma (Folio) (French Edition);
- Follow GovTrack on social media for more updates:;
- Get PDF Federal Regulation of Chemicals in Commerce: An Overview of Issues for the 113th Congress.
- The Princess Dragon Lord (Hot Paranormal Romance Novella)?
A bill must be passed by both the House and Senate in identical form and then be signed by the President to become law. This bill was introduced in the th Congress, which met from Jan 3, to Jan 2, Legislation not enacted by the end of a Congress is cleared from the books. We recommend the following MLA -formatted citation when using the information you see here in academic work:. GovTrack automatically collects legislative information from a variety of governmental and non-governmental sources.
This page is sourced primarily from Congress. Data via the congress project. Here are some tips to get started. Follow us on Twitter and Facebook for updates about legislation in Congress. Sign up for our articles by email and then get legislative alerts for your reps or issues you care about. Support our work so we can bring you more information about what Congress is doing each day. If you can, please take a few minutes to help us improve GovTrack for users like you. We hope to make GovTrack more useful to policy professionals like you.
Please sign up for our advisory group to be a part of making GovTrack a better tool for what you do. Young Americans have historically been the least involved in politics, despite the huge consequences policies can have on them.